Back

 


Libya protests analysis: 'For Muammar Gaddafi it's kill or be killed'

Ian Black, Middle East editor

 

Libya's leader faces the worst unrest since he seized power,
but no-one expects him to give up peacefully


 

Libya's official name is the Jamahiriya, or "state of the masses", but 41 years after seizing power, a defiant Muammar Gaddafi still rules through secretive decision-making and as a family enterprise in which his sons play leading roles.

Now facing the worst unrest since the revolution, Gaddafi's moves are as opaque as ever. Amid feverish speculation about the future, everything he has ever done suggests he will not relinquish power voluntarily. "We will all die on Libyan soil," sources close to his family told the Saudi paper al-Sharq al-Awsat.

According to unconfirmed reports the repression in Benghazi in eastern Libya is being led by his son Khamis, the Russian-trained commander of an elite special forces unit. Another son, Saadi, is there too, with Abdullah al-Senussi, veteran head of military intelligence.

Last Friday Gaddafi appeared briefly in central Tripoli to cheers from supporters but has not spoken in public or left the heavily-guarded Bab al-Aziziya barracks in the centre of the capital – the target of a US bombing raid in 1986.

The crushing of protests in Benghazi and elsewhere bears the hallmark of his instinctive brutality when faced with challenges to his rule, analysts say.

In the 1980s he sent hit squads to murder exiled "stray dogs" who challenged the revolution. Islamist rebels at home were crushed in the 1990s and in 1996 1,000 prisoners were gunned down in an infamous prison massacre.

"For Gaddafi it's kill or be killed," said opposition writer Ashour Shamis. "Now he's gone straight for the kill."

The uprisings in neighbouring countries do not appear to have shaken his resolve to stay in power. He sent messages of support to Tunisia's Zine al-Abdine Ben Ali and to Egypt's Hosni Mubarak before they stepped down.

Regime survival has marked Gaddafi's moves in recent years – from the handover of the Lockerbie bombing suspects to the surrender of his WMD programme after the invasion of Iraq in 2003. No-one expects him to give up peacefully. He may make gestures such as promising closer consultation or boosting investment in housing and social services, but that seems unlikely to satisfy protesters after such brutality towards ordinary Libyans.

"Gaddafi will find it hard to make concessions in order to survive," said Sir Richard Dalton, a former British ambassador to Libya. "The attitude of the regime is that it's all or nothing."

Another key question is whether the condemnation of western friends will have any effect. Libya's warning to the EU that it will halt cooperation over illegal immigration suggests it will not.

Power in Libya is devolved in some areas to popular committees and there is sometimes talk of dramatic restructuring of government. But all key policy areas – defence, foreign affairs, and security – are firmly in Gaddafi's hands.

Like Mubarak, the Libyan leader has no designated successor. Gaddafi's advice is likely to be coming from his son Muatassim, his national security adviser and leading contender to succeed him. Two years ago Muatassim tried to set up another special unit to rival the one commanded by Khamis.

In recent months both have seemed more powerful than another brother, the reformist Saif al-Islam. Saif focused on civil society and political and economic reform but has taken a back seat in the face of opposition from the old guard and the revolutionary committees. "Creating the appearance of useful employment for Gaddafi's offspring has been an important objective for the regime," reported the US ambassador in a cable released by WikiLeaks.

Other sons have embarrassed their father. Saadi is notoriously ill-behaved, with a record of scuffles with police in Europe, abuse of drugs and alcohol. Hannibal's misbehaviour in Geneva caused a long rupture in Swiss-Libyan relations.

"Gaddafi is a complicated individual who has managed to stay in power for 40 years through a skilful balancing of interests and realpolitik methods," commented the former US ambassador Gene Cretz. Libya's current crisis looks like Gaddafi's biggest challenge yet

Libya protests: 'Now we've seen the blood our fears have gone'

As determined demonstrators against Gaddafi headed to the vast, palm-tree fringed Green Square in central Tripoli on Monday, protesters talked of the gathering as the "new Tahrir Square".

Inspired by Egypt's revolution, they vowed to sleep out in the centre of Libyan's Mediterranean port capital there until "the job was done" and the Libyan dictator had fled.

With the death toll estimated by Libyan rights groups to be more than 400 in five days, this seemed an almost impossibly dangerous challenge. But shocked by the scale of the violent repression of the protests, many felt they had nothing left to lose, according to exiled activists who described the scene.

With phonelines cut off all day, the internet connection patchy, and no foreign journalists allowed in, a news blackout on the ground disorientated residents who couldn't contact relatives. Reporters had to rely on accounts by human rights networks and exiled opposition activists.

But within hours, reports began to filter through about the deafening sound of military aircraft targeting demonstrators in what opposition groups warned was a "massacre". For the second night running, Gaddafi appeared to have deployed a shoot-to-kill policy to disperse the protests that had spread to the capital from the east of the country.

At least three people were killed in Tajura on the Tripoli's outskirts as military aircraft fired on protesters and bombed residential areas, according to one Libyan activist based in London who was in contact with Tripoli residents. Armed men in 4x4s were reportedly driving around the city amid sustained gun fire.

One Libyan activist said: "Gaddafi may be implementing his son's warning that if the Libyans don't just abandon their protests and accept his rule again he would give them a bloodbath. Will the world accept such behaviour from a government towards its people?".

The mood in Tripoli and its residential suburbs was tense and chaotic, according to accounts from residents. Some described locals barricading themselves into neighbourhoods or staying inside, afraid of foreign mercenaries paid by Gaddafi to shoot to kill. Since Sunday, some police stations had been set alight, the building where the General People's Congress, or parliament, meets was on fire on Monday morning, agencies reported.

"We can't trust anyone, there are armed mercenaries around us, ready to shoot us for no reason," one family told French radio. Some Tunisians who had fled the city described a nightmare atmosphere in Tripoli where shots were heard through Sunday night and again on Monday afternoon and people wouldn't leave their home for fear of clashes between pro-Gaddafi crowds and demonstrators.

Ali Zeidan, a senior member of the Libyan League of Human Rights who is in Munich, pieced together the pattern of violence in the Libyan capital that began early on Monday. "Protesters gathered for very big street demonstrations. Then at 3am, forces came without any warning and started shooting live ammunition into the crowd. Some of the demonstrators ran, others fell. There were about 60 killed and around 130 injured. It wasn't the police, it wasn't the army, it was Gaddafi's elite guard assisted by paid foreign African fighters," he told the Guardian.

"Then this morning Tripoli was eerily quiet. All shops, offices, pharmacies, banks were closed. It was as quiet as a Sunday in London 50 years ago."

He said all morning people had prepared for renewed protests on Monday evening in Green Square, with some people making the journey from outside Tripoli.

"Libyans used to be afraid. But after they saw the blood, they aren't afraid anymore, they are angry.

"Everybody knows somebody who has been killed or injured, everyone is very angry. What Gaddafi's son said made people furious, it's as if the people can just be treated like trash. Now people don't want to go back to what they had for the last 42 years [of Gaddafi's rule]. Now they feel no fear, if there are deaths people accept that we must carry on. Protesters will go to the centre again today and keep demonstrating until the job is done."

He added: "This is a new feeling for Libya: people look at their situation where there is no dignity for humans, no respect. The Libyan people are fed up, they are a patient, kind, quiet people, but now there's a feeling that to the outside world they aren't being respected as humans. There's a very strong feeling among young people: what do we have to live for? There's no life, no education, there's no jobs, no sport, no internet, no entertainment. What do we have? Nothing."

One demonstrator posted an account to the Alive in Libya website, describing the attacks on the crowd: "Heavy fire, like it was a war. Until you can't even hear or even see what's happening.

"The demonstrators scattered, and they suddenly brought in their gangs chanting 'Fatih' [One of Gaddafi's titles] and they re-entered the square. We took shelter in the neighbouring buildings for a while then retreated. There was also strikes by anti-aircraft missiles, we saw this in front of us. Those that I saw with my own eyes: two wounded, one shot in the head."

One young woman in Tripoli wrote by email to the Guardian: "The general sentiment here is mixed. One of hope, fear and excitement. Fear not of being hurt or shot but of the unknown. Hope for change. Excitement for what's to come. There is a complete blackout of information. Nothing official, nothing confirmed. Who's winning, how many are dead. Who's still here? Who's left running with their tail between their legs. The only source of information is that between each other."

In the east of Libya, where support for Gaddafi is traditionally weak, the city of Benghazi – where over 200 people are believed to have been killed in five days of violence – was said to have fallen to the protesters after police retreated. Residents were reported to be organising vigilante groups to protect themselves and distribute food. In Paris, the International Federation of Human Rights estimated the death toll at between 300 and 400 by Monday afternoon.

The group also reported soldiers in the east had defected and several towns were in the hands of the opposition. Tunisians who had left Libya described to Agence France-Presse how the disturbances had now reached the west of the country. In Zaouia, 35 miles (60km) west of Tripoli, a Tunisian hairdresser described how police had abandoned the town on Sunday after days of confrontation between pro- Gaddafi groups and protesters. Shops were closed, buildings had been attacked and burned and people had stolen police cars.

Souhayr Belhassen, head of the International Federation of Human Rights, said she had gathered accounts from Tunisians and others who had left Libya, describing how property belonging to Gaddafi had been attacked and police stations set alight. "The revolt is heading to the capital," she said. She said senior figures including ambassadors and security forces, were abandoning Gaddafi. "They have jumped ship and the boat is sinking," she said.


  I  News  I  Current News  I  Articles  I  Features  I  Entertainment  I  Photo Gallery  I  Video Gallery  I
I  Public Opinion  I  About Us  I  Contact Us  I